This is a discussion on Re: Suggested botnet rule scores - SpamAssassin ; On 21 Aug 2007, Kai Schaetzl outgrape: > Nix wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:27:11 +0100: > >> If anybody is really so stupid as to unconditionally block mail from >> hosts merely because of string matching in their ...
On 21 Aug 2007, Kai Schaetzl outgrape:
> Nix wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:27:11 +0100:
>
>> If anybody is really so stupid as to unconditionally block mail from
>> hosts merely because of string matching in their rDNS, I'm not sure they
>> *deserve* to see any email...
>
> No, it's stupid to send mail from "adsl" named ranges if you want to get
> your mail read. I think we can drop this discussion. It doesn't matter
> what you or I think, I just told you what's common practice and keeps
> getting "commoner".
I'm just pointing out, *again*, that this should not be the sole
criterion. I don't think I've had any spam that's scored less than about
4.0 in a week or so: you don't need botnet to contribute much to push
that above 5.0.
(Personally I'd prefer that *no* single rule could push a mail more than
halfway towards spamminess...)