John Rudd wrote:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>> As opposed to preprocessing before using SA to reduce the load. (ie.
>> using blacklist and whitelist before SA)
>>
>>

>
>
> I do not.
>
> (greet-pause of 5 seconds; zen and dsbl as blacklists; local access
> type blocks; dangerous attachment filename blocker; and then clamav
> with Sanesecurity, MSRBL, MBL signatures; all of those _reject_
> messages during the SMTP session before Spam Assassin gets to see them)
>


Do you check any whitelists to bypass ham around SA?