Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Diego Pomatta wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:37:27 -0300:
>
>
>> I always considered it to be more efficient this way, would this be correct?
>>

>
> It's a matter of trust. If you trust the RBL to produce an insignificant
> amount of false positives for you then rejecting at MTA level is the best
> thing you can do. I do it the same way. But there are people/companies who
> think they cannot even afford a single FP, so they cannot do this. Some also
> use RBLs as a source of greylisting which is a very good compromise.
> BTW: you should use zen and not xbl+sbl, anymore, visit the spamhaus.org site.
>
> Kai
>
>

Will do, thanks.