Steve West wrote, on 26/07/07 10:59 AM:
> decoder wrote:
>> Try using the SVN Version (revision 132). This is basically the same
>> as the latest 3.5.x release but some issues with SA 3.2.x were fixed.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> Chris

>
> We are running SA 3.2.1 and just wondering if anyone using the SVN
> version on a production server processing 10,000 to 15,000 emails per
> day? Specifically, I would be interested in hearing if the SVN is
> stable enough to be used in a production environment and what type of
> load gets added.
>
> thx,
>
> SW
>

Just upgraded to 3.2.2. Running FuzzyOCR SVN. Looking ok thus far. We
use to have (many revisions ago ) spamd climb high in CPU and also
children taking too long to complete, but this has not been noticed to
date.

It is not _our_ busy time of the year but :

TOTAL Volume Messages Addresses Hosts
Delayed Failed
Received 1306MB 41693 14264 8
0.0% 546 1.3%
Delivered 1306MB 41149 48547 25
Rejects 109324 35410
Temp Rejects 106 5

We reject at connect (500 errors) so the Reject line would be SPAM /
Block list totals.

JES