Dan Barker wrote:
> That's not "Consumer Friendly", that's just WRONG!
>
> Glad you found it.
>


....well If you were doing "RBL-style" lookups, don't they exclusively
return 127.* addresses on matches - i.e. "no such host" or "address
204.4.4.4" should both be treated as "no such host" as far as RBL
software is concerned?

Sounds to me like the RBL software is wrong - not OpenDNS (hence me
bringing it up in the first place)

--
Cheers

Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1