Re: Bye for good FuzzyOCR

David Morton wrote the following on 7/22/2007 11:08 AM -0800:[color=blue]
>
>
> On Jul 22, 2007, at 9:43 AM, arni wrote:
>[color=green]
> > Loren Wilton schrieb:[color=darkred]
> >>>>>> I'm not recieving much of it anymore anyways.
> >>
> >> FWIW, about 20% of the spam I got today had either a GIF or PNG[/color][/color]
> image attached to it. Most advertizing viagra in clear text with no
> obfuscation, a few advertizing stocks. FuzzyOCR still does quite well
> here.[color=green][color=darkred]
> >>
> >> Loren
> >>[/color]
> > I'm not saying that it doesnt work well anymore, i'm just saying[/color]
> that i dont need it anymore to bring my spam to above 10 points, what
> happened for me lately was the following:[color=green]
> > image spam was above 10 pts already and fuzzyocr didnt run so[/color]
> fuzzyocr only ran for ham with images completely wasting resources
>[color=green]
> > so i uninstalled it[/color]
>
>
> I upgraded a system to SA 3.2, which I see now is not compatible with
> FuzzyOCR yet. I started getting a bunch of image spam again. :(
>
> I wish I had it again...[/color]

I'm running SA 3.2.1 and FuzzyOCR is running just fine here.

Bill