Michael Scheidell wrote the following on 7/21/2007 10:07 AM -0800:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler_sa@verizon.net]
>> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:38 PM
>> To: Michael Scheidell
>> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins
>>
>>

>
>
>> However, AFAIK, the DKIM versions of the rules should fire in
>> the place of the DK_* rules.
>>
>>

>
> SHOULD, as in RFC's? :-)
>
> (doesn't.. Actually) but when I get a chance I'll troubleshoot it and
> make a PR
>
> Does anyone have any emails from yahoo? They all have domainkeys.
>
> How is your dkim/domainkeys set up? What rules triggered?
>
> Or is this just me?


I only use the DKIM SA plugin now with the latest Mail:KIM perl module
(version 0.26), which supports validation of both DK & DKIM signature,
and with this, both DK & DKIM hits will both show up as DKIM hits. Test
from yahoo (uses DK signature only):

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.263 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.892, BAYES_00=-2.599,
BOTNET_SERVERWORDS=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.001, DKIM_VERIFIED=-0.001,
IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, L_P0F_D9=-0.4, L_P0F_Unix=-1,
RCVD_IN_MXRATE_WL=-1, RELAY_US=0.01]
X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) (up: 1800
hrs), (distance 9, link: ethernet/modem), [69.147.95.82]
Received: from smtp119.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp119.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.95.82])
by mail.inetmsg.com (INetMsg Mail Service) with SMTP id 980546D0C45
for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 56102 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2007 20:36:17 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-IDate:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=KyMFQ/KnTUWMW4INZwzDVKi1jpqcixQQiBodqZ4fnptqcvbdAXR3/R/tYDU3Lvh+dLdoRtwLWm+zXgi50Q9K9xyOhL+HdZBoNkU1Tepe5 udc6yJxWdEGzLi7VQrdoUYQwM4oDH+4DrtyO2HRzE0by3OdxY5 3OWwSAW23ebmflvE= ;


Test from gmail (which now uses both DK & DKIM signatures):

X-Spam-Score: -4.563
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.563 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.273, BAYES_00=-2.599,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.001, DKIM_VERIFIED=-0.001, L_P0F_D16=-0.2,
L_P0F_Linux=-0.5, RCVD_IN_MXRATE_WL=-1, RELAY_US=0.01,
SPF_PASS=-0.001]
X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) [high throughput]
(up: 7718 hrs), (distance 16, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.146.177]
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177])
by mail.inetmsg.com (INetMsg Mail Service) with ESMTP id 1373F6D0C46
for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so1615659waf
for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=A9KjJ1nUil/AqVtycDlwIKYfKE1clx5MkEnB5RkRgiTwLXBnPsSxSDRDuuypT QIHFfS93z/ypCuxZbqQ7eTrc+JLmRfyAN5vlZuo5vtjDXX8p4PTh5WtGw52c 22ar72dpn6zYXTrnQhdxQT+BTfgpm+Qg6JSEpWrS8uHLEInooM =
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=MLl9a61usX0iHxBuGV0Jgx0kIxfegRla6Rh6Xn/TODe+kpYt1afI8Cxkyum9ltKPlTHJK5xbmPpZtGJEE3eEq178f Q8sBx96xxMeyG4/KUhBbZaNeumG4oZoiTO7vDh5CXIBNG6zO/dL8wjdbpO0Po013J3kqBDQPHMnJj+B488=


Bill