--nextPart8238143.N5ej3TEZbf
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 14 July 2007 10:48 am, SM wrote:

> >Yet their markup shows:
> > > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
> > > Old-X-Spam-Score: 0
> > > Old-X-Spam-Level:
> > > Old-X-Spam-Status: No, score=3D0 tagged_above=3D-10 required=3D6
> > > tests=3D[none]

> >
> >Their explaination for this is:
> > > It's not that they had no tests run, it's that they had all the tests
> > > run and the score came out as ZERO so no header was added.
> > > Jim...

> >
> >That just doesn't sound right to me that all possible tests were run
> >and there
> >were no hits, but I guess its possible.

>
> Are you assuming that the two configurations are identical? Yours
> has Bayes, DKIM verification, Pyzor and DCC enabled. They may not be
> be using those plugins.
>
> Regards,
> -sm


I know they're not using Bayes because it was so inacurate that they quit=20
using it. I realize they're not using the same tests or plug-ins as I am, i=
t=20
just doesn't make sense to me that an ISP could run all possible tests and=
=20
have none of them hit.

=2D-=20
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C

--nextPart8238143.N5ej3TEZbf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGmPuT43Kn2pjmcFwRAjlcAJ9DL9DWgHlDhwAc9VruPT iUxJKUJACfVA6f
bym110ptYHB8GySlJwg/xFg=
=U1d3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart8238143.N5ej3TEZbf--