John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Kelson wrote:
>>> I don't think the typical SA ruleset is big enough to take advantage of
>>> BitTorrent.

>> However, what you might gain is the redundancy if (in fantasy
>> world) every user was also serving them out via bittorrent.
>> I was just mulling over in my head a hypothetical
>> "BittorrentMirror" client. The idea being to mirror a group of
>> files (rulesemporium rules, the whole site, etc).

> I'll bring this up again: coral.
> Is there some reason pointing everyone at the coral cache of the
> website won't work? Granted, coral is also intended for large files,
> but it is distributed and is almost transparent...

You and I already had a discussion about this on May 24th... coral sucks
for two reasons; (i) it's on an alternate port and (ii) it corrupts the
files. You suggested I get them to fix it, I suggested I couldn't be