> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:20:12PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 13.07.07 09:15, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > > It should only match a missing header.

>
> "missing header" doesn't mean "the header doesn't exist", btw. It's a
> subtle difference, please see below.
>
> > bug 5207 should be reopened then...

>
> Nope.

[...]
> The header "exists:header_name" test really converts into:
> header_data =~ /./
>
> which requires that there be a character in the header_data.


aha.

On 13.07.07 12:51, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> I'll put this in the bug for future reference.


good, thanks. Could you also please change the description to
"missing or empty" to avoid confusion for next time?

(maybe Missing subject would help too, but the "Missing Subject: header" is
really confusing imho)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.