Re: meaning of MISSING_SUBJECT ?
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:20:12PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > On 13.07.07 09:15, Matt Kettler wrote:[color=darkred]
> > > It should only match a missing header.[/color][/color]
> "missing header" doesn't mean "the header doesn't exist", btw. It's a
> subtle difference, please see below.
> > bug 5207 should be reopened then...[/color]
> The header "exists:header_name" test really converts into:
> header_data =~ /./
> which requires that there be a character in the header_data.[/color]
On 13.07.07 12:51, Theo Van Dinter wrote:[color=blue]
> I'll put this in the bug for future reference. :)[/color]
good, thanks. Could you also please change the description to
"missing or empty" to avoid confusion for next time?
(maybe Missing subject would help too, but the "Missing Subject: header" is
really confusing imho)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email]email@example.com[/email] ; [url]http://www.fantomas.sk/[/url]
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.