This is a discussion on Re: So what about rulesemporium.com and these anti-PDF rules? - SpamAssassin ; Robert Schetterer schrieb: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Justin Mason schrieb: >> Henrik Krohns writes: >>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:08:29AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote: >>>> Bear in mind that the spammer who ...
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Justin Mason schrieb:
>> Henrik Krohns writes:
>>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:08:29AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>>>> Bear in mind that the spammer who is developing this PDF spam is only one
>>>> person, and he/she probably has at least one non-spammy-looking email
>>>> address at his disposal.
>>>> What's to spot him/her from asking Dallas for a copy of the ruleset and
>>>> plugin, same as any other SpamAssassin user, waiting a few days to cover
>>>> his/her tracks, then fixing the spam to avoid it again?
>>>> And if you think this isn't already happening, I have a bridge for sale
>>> If I was a spammer, I couldn't care less if few people were using some
>>> secret PDF blocking stuff. It's not like AOL or some big companies are using
>> oh yeah -- good point. On one occasion in the past when spammers have
>> evaded open-source-developed rules, I was able to find out later why they
>> made those changes, and it had nothing to do with our little open source
>> projects... instead it was to evade AOL's independently-developed,
>> closed-source, secret-sauce filtering which used a similar method.
>> The big guys are the spammers' targets.
> Hi, i have the pdf rules up and running
> they are working nice.
> But i didnt recieved any pdf spam since days.
> On our big back mx mail hub , clam ( with some additional databases)
> gets delete ca.
> 10 of them a day.
> I think we will see other spam in the future
> in other file sorts, and it will always be a competition
> between spammers and antispam tecs.
scnr: So what comes next?: After image-spam, pdf-spam it must be
Just to be a step ahead this time i consider blocking these
(ms-office-attachments) in advance ;-).
> I think we will never avoid spam in total as long smtp
> stays for mail, but we can make more difficult for spammers
> to reach there goals , so i recommend take it easy, no need for
> flames between the good boys
> http://sanesecurity.co.uk/ is working nice if youre in pressure
> with pdf spam
Using this a few weeks too, had no FPs so far ...
> - --
> Mit freundlichen Gruessen
> Best Regards
> Robert Schetterer
Dont send mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org