On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:38:03 +0200, Matthias Keller
wrote:

>Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:07:52 -0400, Phil Barnett
>> wrote:
>>
>> =20
>>> Is anyone else getting these failed messages on their tripwire.cf =

updates?
>>>
>>> I've been getting this message for several days now.
>>>
>>> It looks to me like the new tripwire.cf is very broken.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>>>
>>> Subject: RulesDuJour Run Summary on taz5.fiberhosting.net
>>> Date: Thursday 21 June 2007 02:26
>>> From:
>>> To:
>>>
>>> RulesDuJour Run Summary on taz5.fiberhosting.net:
>>>
>>> TripWire has changed on taz5.fiberhosting.net.
>>> Version line:
>>>
>>> ***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
>>> Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
>>> Rollback command is: mv -f /usr/share/spamassassin/tripwire.cf
>>> /usr/share/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/99_
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2; mv -f
>>> /usr/share/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/tripwire.cf.20070621-0225
>>> /usr/share/spamassassin/tripwire.cf;
>>>
>>> Lint output: [24363] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
>>> [24363] =

warn: config:
>>> failed to parse line, skipping: >>> CONTENT=3D"no-cache"> [24363] warn: config: failed to parse line, =

skipping:
>>> [24363] warn: config: =

failed to
>>> parse line, skipping: [24363] warn: lint: 4 issues =

detected,
>>> please rerun with debug enabled for more information
>>> =20

>>
>> I've been getting the same for weeks. I ended up manually updating
>> rules; especially the stock one since more and more seem to be
>> slipping through.
>>
>> The problems seemed to start after the DDoS on rulesemporium; since
>> then I've not been able to get any sense out of it via RDJ.
>>
>> When I manually update it all lint's clean. Time consuming but it
>> works
>> =20

>Just try to delete the downloaded files in your rules_du_jour folder
>(for example /etc/mail/spamassassin/rules_du_jour/* ), respectively just
>the rule(s) that go wrong.I then redownloads the rules correctly and
>you're clear to go with RDJ again
>
>Matt


Give that man a cigar!....

Seemed to work OK. Thanks Matt.

Kind regards

Nigel