John Rudd wrote:
> LuKreme wrote:
>> On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
>>> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
>>> reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
>>> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
>>> reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org

>>
>> Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much ham
>> for my tastes, and I never found that dsbl was hitting anything (or at
>> least nothing that sbl-xbl (now zen) didn't already catch).
>>

>
> I do zen and dsbl, and dsbl catches about 1 for every 20 that zen does.
> I do both _just_in_case_ there isn't perfect overlap.
>
>
> I agree entirely about spamcop. Some people use it for spam marking,
> which I am also leery about ... but it seems to me to be absolutely
> insane to use spamcop for an actual block list.


It's fine for scoring against, but blocking is insanity!

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.ie/
http://blog.blacknight.ie/
Tel. 1850 929 929
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763