LuKreme wrote:
> On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
>> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
>> reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
>> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
>> reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org

>
> Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much ham for
> my tastes, and I never found that dsbl was hitting anything (or at least
> nothing that sbl-xbl (now zen) didn't already catch).
>


I do zen and dsbl, and dsbl catches about 1 for every 20 that zen does.
I do both _just_in_case_ there isn't perfect overlap.


I agree entirely about spamcop. Some people use it for spam marking,
which I am also leery about ... but it seems to me to be absolutely
insane to use spamcop for an actual block list.