On Wednesday, Jun 13th 2007 at 17:14 -0400, quoth Rosenbaum, Larry M.:

=>> From: Steven W. Orr [mailto:steveo@syslang.net]
=>>
=>> [root@saturn ~]# rpm -Uvh
=>> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/spamassassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm
=>> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm
=>> Preparing...
=>###########################################
=>> [100%]
=>> 1erl-Mail-SpamAssassin
=>> ########################################### [ 50%]
=>> 2:spamassassin
=>> ########################################### [100%]
=>> Stopping spamd: [ OK ]
=>> Starting spamd: [13775] error: Can't locate
=>> Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
=>...
=>>
=>> Am I concerned? Where is CompiledRegexps supposed to be and why is it
=>> not
=>> there?
=>
=>I think it means you have Rule2XSBody uncommented in v320.pre but you
=>don't have a compiled ruleset. Perhaps you ran sa-compile under v3.2.0
=>but you haven't run it under v3.2.1.

Thanks to Larry for the answer. This leads to a question about how SA is
packaged:

I downloaded the tarfile and built an rpm. When I installed the rpm, the
rpm was smart enough to restart SA. Should this postinst code in the rpm
not also have rerun sa-compile before the restart? Seems logical to me.

--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net