This is a discussion on RE: DUL Lists? - OT - SpamAssassin ; Dan Barker schrieb: > > I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with: > > > > Unexpected connection response from server: > > 421 mails from 126.96.36.199 refused: local dynamic IP address > > 188.8.131.52" > > > > ...
Dan Barker schrieb:
> > I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
> > Unexpected connection response from server:
> > 421 mails from 184.108.40.206 refused: local dynamic IP address
> > 220.127.116.11"
> > Does anybody recognize the text of the message? I'd like to confirm
> > that there are no popular DUL lists showing 18.104.22.168 as dynamic,
> > but the 421 message says very little. DNSReport says it's clean. I've
> > tried to contact some postmaster accounts (using Yahoo.com, since I
> > can't use my own mailer) but they appear to be RFC ignorant too.
> > Unfortunately, it's not just one ISP in Germany and I'd like to
> > understand if there's anything I can do on my side.
> > The only thing that comes to mind is that my rDNS is delegated to my
> > own name server. Maybe there's some sort of DNS software out in the
> > wild that doesn't support delegation? I'm really at a loss.
> > Dan
> 22.214.171.124.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 126.96.36.199.74.in-addr.arpa.
> 188.8.131.52.74.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mail.visioncomm.net.
> probably a not so clever blacklist considering your ip dynamic because the
alias has its own ip in the alias name
Dan Barker follows up:
I "think" you confirmed that my delegated rDNS is proper and that the 421
message is in error. But I'm not certain. Can you please confirm your
assessment? My ISP provides me a /26 subnet out of the 184.108.40.206 class C,
so the rDNS delegation is done with CNAMEs from the class C subnet to my
220.127.116.11/26 subnet's DNS servers. They serve the appropriate PTR
Thanks again for the bandwidth;