The Episcopal Diocese of El Camino Realheld its Diocesan Convention 2009last weekend. I was a Delegate from St. Andrew's Episcopal Church (Saratoga, California) and my husband, John Plocher, was anAlternate Delegate and also backed up Web Sacristan Stephenie Cooper in managing the information flow to the big screen. Our son Paul was a convention Youth Representative for the first time. This blog entry is to document how Stephenie and John set things up so that there is a record for our own future use (and because it might be of use to others). This blog does not provide much information about the sound system, which had a separate crew managing it.Ours is not a big diocese, there are 47 parishes (church areas) between Nipomo and Palo Alto on California's central coast, with 189 possiblelay Delegates and 134 possible clergy Delegates. Our leader is Bishop Mary Gray-Reeves.

There were 200 to 250 people inSherwood Hall (Salinas) during the two days of convention. Sherwood Hall hasa raised proscenium-style stage which is forty feet deep and sixty feet wide.Here are some diagrams John drew of the stage layout and hardware, plusphotos of what it looked like in the hall and behind the big screen:



Overview

Stephenie has been running the computers for convention for many years; this is John's first time. The computer resources required to run convention have been doublingor tripling each year. The big screen presents everything at convention, including the agenda, instructions, song lyrics, the text of resolutions and ballot lists, plus videos and slide shows. The convention has a somewhat flexible schedule since resolutions may be amended, discussions may go longer or shorter than planned, and people may arrive with a video or slide show to add that is unexpected or does not match what they said they would bring. The convention follows Robert's Rules of Order for meeting procedure.

Stephenie lives near us, so she and John mocked up the convention audio/visual layout at our house in the weeks before the event. They used every computer we had plus monitors borrowed from the computer lab at SMUM (Santa Maria Urban Ministry). John bought about $125 in bits and pieces toput everything together.

Stephenie and John relied on PC and Mac laptops using simple andstandard tools. That is, the displays used the same hardware and software tools with which the information was originally put together. There was no special software package. Reusing standard pieces allowed quick responses plusmaximum flexibility, additions, and changes during the event. There was much dynamic interaction and modification of both music and meeting content.In general, Stephenie ran the screen while John queued material and coordinated withpeople who came backstage to add or change or discuss what was coming next.

The convention had very few computer problems this year. Every once in awhile, during a transition we in the hall would hear a voice coming from behind the screen saying "almost ready..." Of course, several people repliedwith "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain."

Here are John's notes:

Requirements

* Working from a detailed master agenda that is subject to real-time revision, o Project desired content on main auditorium screen where it can be seen by delegates and head table. o Show slideshows, movies and presentations authored and produced by others. o Show song lyrics - and follow along verse by verse as sung. o Show announcements (break, lunch, count down timer). o Show resolutions: + Modify to show motions to amend in progress. + Show total and individual debate limit timers. + Update as voting results dictate. * Show "default background image" whenever other content is not being displayed. * Allow real-time editing and addition of content - agenda changes/reordering, new songs, movies, resolutions, etc. * Synchronize activities to meeting in progress as dictated by the Secretary of Convention. * Do this all from a back stage position without direct views of auditorium or head table.

Hardware setup (see diagram above)

* a 4-way Video Amplifier cabled to a local video monitor, the projector and a head table monitor. * The 4-way amp was connected to a 4-way VGA KVM switch that only used the "V" connections. This allowed us to easily choose the video source to be displayed from any of the * 4 laptops, which were connected to external video monitors and configured to use both the laptop screen and the external monitor as an "extended desktop". 2-way VGA amps connected to each laptop so they could drive both the monitor and the KVM switch/video distribution amp setup. The use of a dual-monitor setup allowed us to edit and direct content from one screen while using the other as a potential video source (more on this below). * The laptops were networked together via a local wireless hub/router that was also connected to * a 320GB networked hard disk for shared file storage * a networked video camera (Axis 2100) aimed at the head table * a color copier/scanner/printer

Operation

- All systems were set up to use the convention "image" as the default desktop screen background, so that when no windows were open, their "second" display could be used as a placeholder video source.- One system was set up to be the presentation and movie display host. Quicktime, powerpoint and other software was loaded onto it, and its "headphone out" audio jack was connected to the house sound system.- Another system was set up to show the Axis video camera's display on its primary screen so to get visual feedback cues from the presenters. (This could have been done with a TV monitor and inexpensive surveillance cameras instead.) - A monitor speaker was run from the house sound system so that John andStephenie could hear what was happening in front of the screen and inthe hall. There was also an audio feed into the sound system so that music and movies could play from the computers.- A third system was configured as a web page editing station in addition to being the primary content display driver. The content was accessed by special links from an annotated detailed agenda that sported additional presentation cues, such as "SONG", "RESOLUTION 1", "LUNCH ANNOUNCEMENT", "MISSION MOVIE", etc. All content on this system was in HTML, and the special links on the detailed agenda (and on the song lyrics index page) were of the form .... This allowed us to display the detailed agenda and song lyrics pages iin a browser window on the laptop screen, and have the "projector" window that popped up when a link was clicked positioned "fullscreen" on the second monitor. Displaying any piece of content was as easy as clicking on its cue.- The last system displayed a copy of the detailed agenda. Its second display was cued with a copy of the 1-page simplified agenda used by the delegates. This proved to be useful in coordinating a presentation and lyrics from two systems or to pull up a default display during breaks.

Thoughts for next time

Bring and use at least 4 video monitoring cameras so that backstage can see the head table, the presenter's lectern, the musicians and the delegates/audience. Being limited to only one of these shots made coordination and timing difficult. If there had been more debate on the resolutions, we would not have been able to closely coordinate timers, motions and the like.Move the main display screen up from the stage by at least 8 feet to get it out of the direct and reflected stage lighting (improves sight lines, heightenscontrast).Choose a sans- style font and a better background/foreground color contrastfor greater visibility in the large hall. Play to the eyesight of the most senior members of the group. Develop a stage lighting diagram at least 2 months before convention so that the Sherwood Hall AV and IT staff in Salinas can work with us to optimize things. Use an 8-1/2" x 11" sheet of paper - same proportions as the actual 40' x 60' stage.Get a projector that has at least 2,000 Lumens.



Images Copyright 2009 by Katy Dickinson and John Plocher



More...