This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============2082618905==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8A92A.5AFEFFD3"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8A92A.5AFEFFD3
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
=20
=20
I have a MIB that defines 3 tabular fields that must be processed as a
cohesive unit of data. For example IP, netmask, default gateway.
I am using net-snmp v5.2.4 and my tables use the iterate-access style of
coding.
=20
=20
I want to access the three vbs from a single request and set them to
"already processed" so they are not checked for validity again.
I am going to leave the set logic alone and each var can be set
individually, they are just checked as a group.
Clearly I could do nothing special and check the group 3 times, but I am
trying to be somewhat efficient.
=20
=20
I have been analyzing the data structures for=20
=20
netsnmp_request_info *request;
netsnmp_table_request_info *table_info;
netsnmp_variable_list *var;
The request data structure is all the incoming data given to the
processing handler. It seems to be a list of requests, each with
different lists of varbinds (although mostly common to each other). I
see that each varbind in the request in a multivarbind check or set is
listed under request->requestvb and that each subsequent request in the
submitted list removes a vb from the head of the requestvb list as the
check or set is processed. I first thought the request->processed flag
would do the trick but subsequent requests in the list could contain the
vbs I need to look at.
I also see the var->data and var->dataFreeHook() in the varbind
structure, I could use this to save some state info (like a boolean =
=3D=3D
TRUE) to prevent rechecking, and free it when the check routines are
complete.
My question is. Is there a better way to do this that fits in with the
architecture? Is there a way to set a vb as checked that is built in?
Thanks in advance,
Adam
=20
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission =
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected =
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in =
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this =
message and deleting it from your computer without copying =
or disclosing it.
=0D
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8A92A.5AFEFFD3
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
charset=3Dus-ascii">
Hi=20
all,
class=3D012250412-28042008>
class=3D012250412-28042008>
I have =
a MIB that=20
defines 3 tabular fields that must be processed as a cohesive unit of=20
data. For example IP, netmask, default =
gateway.
I am =
using net-snmp=20
v5.2.4 and my tables use the iterate-access style of =
coding.
class=3D012250412-28042008>
class=3D012250412-28042008>
I want =
to access the=20
three vbs from a single request and set them to "already processed" so =
they are=20
not checked for validity again.
I am =
going to leave=20
the set logic alone and each var can be set individually, they are just =
checked=20
as a group.
class=3D012250412-28042008>Clearly I could do=20
nothing special and check the group 3 times, but I am trying to be =
somewhat=20
efficient.
class=3D012250412-28042008>
class=3D012250412-28042008>
I have =
been=20
analyzing the data structures for
size=3D2>
class=3D012250412-28042008>
>
size=3D2>
class=3D012250412-28042008>netsnmp_request_info=20
*request;
size=3D2>netsnmp_table_request_info=20
*table_info;
netsnmp_variable_list =
*var;
The =
request data=20
structure is all the incoming data given to the processing handler. It =
seems to=20
be a list of requests, each with different lists of varbinds (although =
mostly=20
common to each other). I see that each varbind in the=20
request in a multivarbind check or set is listed under=20
request->requestvb and that each subsequent=20
request in the submitted list removes a vb from the =
head of the=20
requestvb list as the check or set is processed. =
I first=20
thought the request->processed flag would do the =
trick but=20
subsequent requests in the list could contain the vbs I =
need to=20
look at.
I also =
see the=20
var->data and =
var->dataFreeHook() in the=20
varbind structure, I could use this to save some state info (like a =
boolean=20
=3D=3D TRUE) to prevent rechecking, and free it when the check =
routines=20
are complete.
My =
question is. =20
Is there a better way to do this that fits in with the =
architecture? Is=20
there a way to set a vb as checked that is built in?
Thanks =
in=20
advance,
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Adam
size=3D2>
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission =
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected =
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in =
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this =
message and deleting it from your computer without copying =
or disclosing it.
=0D
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8A92A.5AFEFFD3--
--===============2082618905==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757...un.com/javaone
--===============2082618905==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders
--===============2082618905==--
