On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:13:09 +0100
"Dave Shield" wrote:

> However, I've spotted one minor flaw in :
>
> #ifndef HAVE_UINT64_T
> #ifdef HAVE_U_INT64_T
> typedef u_int64_t uint64_t;
> #elif defined(INT64_T)
> typedef unsigned INT64_T uint64_t;
> #endif
> #define HAVE_UINT64_T 1
> #endif
>
> This block will end up defining the token HAVE_UINT64_T,
> even if neither of the internal tests match (and hence the
> type "uint64_t" isn't actually defined!)
>
> Shouldn't the line
> #define HAVE_UINT64_T 1
> be moved into the two relevant blocks?


You are right. Thanks for pointing out, and excuse me for
my carelessness.
Could you apply the following patch to 5.3 and 5.4 tree?

Best Regards,
----
Mitsuru Chinen

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders