On 03/07/07, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> >>>>> "MC" == Mitsuru Chinen writes:

>
> MC> Patch 1728247 is created under recognition where the SIZEOF_LONG_LONG
> ...
> MC> I'd like to call for votes to include it in 5.4.1.
>
> +1 and applied to V5-4-patches and V5-3-patches.


Also applied to V5-2-patches and main development trunk.

However, I've spotted one minor flaw in :

#ifndef HAVE_UINT64_T
#ifdef HAVE_U_INT64_T
typedef u_int64_t uint64_t;
#elif defined(INT64_T)
typedef unsigned INT64_T uint64_t;
#endif
#define HAVE_UINT64_T 1
#endif

This block will end up defining the token HAVE_UINT64_T,
even if neither of the internal tests match (and hence the
type "uint64_t" isn't actually defined!)

Shouldn't the line
#define HAVE_UINT64_T 1
be moved into the two relevant blocks?


Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders