On 11/05/07, Robert Story wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:08:13 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> d) If you want to replace this patch with gen-generated code, go right ahead.
> Why check in 'new' cut-n-past of an old version, instead of simply reverting
> to the previous known good version?

'Cos the previous version didn't handle Wes' addition of the two new tokens.
That was the intention of the revision that turned out to break things. Why
move back when we can move forward?


This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
Net-snmp-coders mailing list