This is a discussion on r16341 - SNMP ; Hello. I'd like to know if the last chunk in r16341 really was intended to be comitted? Index: agent/snmp_agent.c ================================================== ================= --- agent/snmp_agent.c (revision 16340) +++ agent/snmp_agent.c (revision 16341) @@ -2184,6 +2212,8 @@ } DEBUGMSGTL(("snmp_agent", "GETBULK N = %d, M ...
Hello.
I'd like to know if the last chunk in r16341 really was intended to be
comitted?
Index: agent/snmp_agent.c
================================================== =================
--- agent/snmp_agent.c (revision 16340)
+++ agent/snmp_agent.c (revision 16341)
@@ -2184,6 +2212,8 @@
}
DEBUGMSGTL(("snmp_agent", "GETBULK N = %d, M = %d, R = %d\n",
n, asp->pdu->errindex, r));
+ fprintf(stderr, "GETBULK N = %d, M = %d, R = %d\n",
+ n, asp->pdu->errindex, r);
}
/*
I propose that the chunk should be reverted.
/MF
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders
