Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> I wasn't aware that we should write the implementations in the common
> subset of C and C++ but if that is the case then I could do so.
>
> All of the reports below are the result of code like
>
> aType* foo = malloc(sizeof(aType));
>
> and that is perfectly valid C, but it could be changed to
>
> aType* foo = (aType*)malloc(sizeof(aType));
>
> to move it into the common subset of C and C++.


As most of the code already builds fine with g++, /me thinks it should
be done.


+Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?p...rge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders