This is a discussion on Re: Bug#363399: Net SNMP has broken sysObjectID - SNMP ; On 20.04.06 Thomas Anders (email@example.com) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi all, > >>So should we go for linux and unknown as platform? Or always > >>unknown? > >> > >I've upstream in Cc. Ask them for either updating the ...
On 20.04.06 Thomas Anders (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> >>So should we go for linux and unknown as platform? Or always
> >I've upstream in Cc. Ask them for either updating the MIB or go for
> Can you please give your exact platform details?
hille@kloetzer:~ $ uname -a
Linux kloetzer 2.6.16-1-686 #2 Sat Apr 15 20:45:20 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
What else do you need?
> "unknown" should cover any system not mentioned explicitely before:
No "hurd" in there. How big is the chance that the net-snmp coders
will expand the MIB zu define another OID for Hurd?
> A sysObject.0 value of 18.104.22.168.0.0.0.0.0.0 should not happen.
Well, this is exactly what this bug^1 is about. I've installed the
snmpd package from Debian and used the default configuration. Result:
hille@kloetzer:~ $ snmpget -v2c -c public 127.0.0.1:161 .22.214.171.124.126.96.36.199.0
SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::dod.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
.. I've rebuilt the package from the sources and got the same result.
The configure options of the package do not manipulate the
sysObjectID. So this can be either:
- a broken patch in the Debian package, or
- an upstream bug.
As we see the same behavior on FreeBSD, I guess the latter is the case.
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
Net-snmp-coders mailing list