[security] SeaMonkey 1.1.10 and Firefox 2.0.0.15 - Slackware

This is a discussion on [security] SeaMonkey 1.1.10 and Firefox 2.0.0.15 - Slackware ; Manuel Reimer wrote: > security releases of the two Mozilla based products "SeaMonkey" and > "Firefox" have been published 2008-07-02 and 2008-07-01 by the project > maintainers. > > So far Slackware has *no* patch package! At least one of ...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 41 to 42 of 42

Thread: [security] SeaMonkey 1.1.10 and Firefox 2.0.0.15

  1. Re: [security] SeaMonkey 1.1.10 and Firefox 2.0.0.15

    Manuel Reimer wrote:
    > security releases of the two Mozilla based products "SeaMonkey" and
    > "Firefox" have been published 2008-07-02 and 2008-07-01 by the project
    > maintainers.
    >
    > So far Slackware has *no* patch package! At least one of the holes, in
    > detail this one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419846


    Did anyone notice that this whiner didn't post anything when Pat had
    out the 2.0.0.16 (and SeaMonkey 1.1.11) upgrades long before all other
    major distributions?
    --
    ************************************************** *****************
    ** Eef Hartman, Delft University of Technology, dept. SSC/ICT **
    ** e-mail: E.J.M.Hartman@tudelft.nl, fax: +31-15-278 7295 **
    ** snail-mail: P.O. Box 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands **
    ************************************************** *****************

  2. Re: [security] SeaMonkey 1.1.10 and Firefox 2.0.0.15

    On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:18:05 +0200
    Eef Hartman wrote:

    > Did anyone notice that this whiner didn't post anything when Pat had
    > out the 2.0.0.16 (and SeaMonkey 1.1.11) upgrades long before all other
    > major distributions?


    It does pose the question though, why did the first one take so long?
    Slipped under the radar perhaps?

    --
    Roger Brown
    roger2@rogerbrown.no-ip.org
    http://rogerbrown.no-ip.org


+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3