Re: Gaming terms you invented - Sinclair
This is a discussion on Re: Gaming terms you invented - Sinclair ; spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
> fuzzix did eloquently scribble:
>
>>When playing Half-Life 2 anything that flies at me is dubbed a "****
>>hawk" in homage to Jim Lahey of Sunnyvale Trailer Park. Can't say I
>>invented that one...
>
> My ...
-
Re: Gaming terms you invented
spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
> fuzzix did eloquently scribble:
>
>>When playing Half-Life 2 anything that flies at me is dubbed a "****
>>hawk" in homage to Jim Lahey of Sunnyvale Trailer Park. Can't say I
>>invented that one...
>
> My dad called the hawks that followed old locomotives in the 40s
> ****e hawks... For obvious "do not use whilst in the station" reasons.
With some swift Googling, I've established that a) a ****ehawk is in
fact one of the birds from Batty, and b) CSS has officially run out of
things to talk about.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/com...418b872d26f07e
-
Re: Gaming terms you invented
Matthew Westcott did eloquently scribble:
> spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
>> fuzzix did eloquently scribble:
>>
>>>When playing Half-Life 2 anything that flies at me is dubbed a "****
>>>hawk" in homage to Jim Lahey of Sunnyvale Trailer Park. Can't say I
>>>invented that one...
>>
>> My dad called the hawks that followed old locomotives in the 40s
>> ****e hawks... For obvious "do not use whilst in the station" reasons.
> With some swift Googling, I've established that a) a ****ehawk is in
> fact one of the birds from Batty, and b) CSS has officially run out of
> things to talk about.
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/com...418b872d26f07e
Just goes to prove that time is cyclical, we just looped back to 2000.
Anything you did wrong the first time... now's your chance.

--
__________________________________________________ ____________________________
| spike1@freenet.co.uk | |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
| in | suck is probably the day they start making |
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: Gaming terms you invented
"Matthew Westcott" wrote:
> With some swift Googling, I've established that a) a
> ****ehawk is in fact one of the birds from Batty, and
> b) CSS has officially run out of things to talk about.
Is this group stuck in a loop?
Eq.
-
Re: Gaming terms you invented
Paul E Collins did eloquently scribble:
> "Matthew Westcott" wrote:
>> With some swift Googling, I've established that a) a
>> ****ehawk is in fact one of the birds from Batty, and
>> b) CSS has officially run out of things to talk about.
> Is this group stuck in a loop?
Mmmm, willow
--
__________________________________________________ ____________________________
| spike1@freenet.co.uk | |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
| in | suck is probably the day they start making |
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: Gaming terms you invented
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:45:54 +0100, "Paul E Collins"
wrote:
>"Matthew Westcott" wrote:
>
>> With some swift Googling, I've established that a) a
>> ****ehawk is in fact one of the birds from Batty, and
>> b) CSS has officially run out of things to talk about.
>
>Is this group stuck in a loop?
>
>Eq.
>
Mmm, Buffy
-
Re: Gaming terms you invented
spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
> Just goes to prove that time is cyclical, we just looped back to 2000.
> Anything you did wrong the first time... now's your chance.
> 
But what if I accidentally kill my grandfather? (It's 2000, you clot,
not 1900 - Time Travel Ed.)
--
Duncan Snowden.
-
Re: Gaming terms you invented
On Apr 15, 4:45 pm, "Paul E Collins"
wrote:
> "Matthew Westcott" wrote:
> > With some swift Googling, I've established that a) a
> > ****ehawk is in fact one of the birds from Batty, and
> > b) CSS has officially run out of things to talk about.
>
> Is this group stuck in a loop?
THERE IS NO WIKIPEDIA! [1]
[1] Well, they seem to reckon *we* don't exist, so why not
reciprocate? :-)