[Linux][c.o.l.s] Newb, rpm, Failed dependencies ... - Setup
This is a discussion on [Linux][c.o.l.s] Newb, rpm, Failed dependencies ... - Setup ; People,
I'm trying to install Oracle on my RH box.
The Oracle installer complained about some missing rpms:
Checking for compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.7.2; found Not found.
Failed
Checking for libstdc++devel-3.4.3-22.1; found Not found. Failed
Checking for openmotif-21-2.1.30-11; found Not found. Failed
Checking ...
-
[Linux][c.o.l.s] Newb, rpm, Failed dependencies ...
People,
I'm trying to install Oracle on my RH box.
The Oracle installer complained about some missing rpms:
Checking for compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.7.2; found Not found.
Failed <<<<
Checking for libstdc++devel-3.4.3-22.1; found Not found. Failed
<<<<
Checking for openmotif-21-2.1.30-11; found Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for pdksh-5.2.14-30; found Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for gnome-libs-1.4.1.2.90-44.1; found Not found. Failed
<<<<
Checking for sysstat-5.0.5-1; found Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for compat-db-4.1.25-9; found Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for control-center-2.8.0-12; found Not found. Failed <<<<
Checking for xscreensaver-4.18-5.rhel4.2; found Not found. Failed
<<<<
Some of these were easy to solve via a quick trip to rpmseek.com
I'm struggling with this one:
[root@ow2 software]# rpm -Uvh libstdc++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm
warning: libstdc++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY,
key ID 443e1821
error: Failed dependencies:
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1) is needed by (installed)
kdelibs-3.5.4-0.1.fc5.i386
libstdc++ = 4.1.1-1.fc5 is needed by (installed)
libstdc++-devel-4.1.1-1.fc5.i386
libstdc++ = 4.1.1-1.fc5 is needed by (installed)
gcc-c++-4.1.1-1.fc5.i386
[root@ow2 software]#
I'm not sure how to fix this.
It appears to my simple brain that some of this stuff is already
installed:
[root@ow2 software]# rpm -qa | grep libstdc
libstdc++so7-devel-4.2.0-0.3.20060428.fc5.3
libstdc++-4.1.1-1.fc5
libstdc++-devel-4.1.1-1.fc5
libstdc++so7-4.2.0-0.3.20060428.fc5.3
compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-135
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
[root@ow2 software]#
I find that working with rpms is kind of confusing.
I'm used to dealing with Solaris and FreeBSD which
does not confuse me so much.
What can I do to get
libstdc++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm
installed?
-Peter
PeterSmith@gmail.com
http://GoodJobFastCar.com
-
Re: [Linux][c.o.l.s] Newb, rpm, Failed dependencies ...
Peter Smith [gjfc] did eloquently scribble:
> What can I do to get
> libstdc++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm
> installed?
use rpm -i --nodeps
That bypasses dependency checking
--
| |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack|
| spike1@freenet.co.uk |in the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you|
| |can't move, with no hope of rescue. |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)|Consider how lucky you are that life has been |
| in |good to you so far... |
| Computer Science | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy.|
-
Re: [Linux][c.o.l.s] Newb, rpm, Failed dependencies ...
On 24 Nov 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.setup, in article
<1164419250.666351.153120@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups. com>, Peter Smith [gjfc]
wrote:
>I'm trying to install Oracle on my RH box.
What version of Oracle on what version of Red Hat?
>The Oracle installer complained about some missing rpms:
>
>Checking for compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.7.2; found Not found.
>Failed <<<<
>Checking for libstdc++devel-3.4.3-22.1; found Not found. Failed
><<<<
>Checking for openmotif-21-2.1.30-11; found Not found. Failed <<<<
That's cool. 'compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132' is Fedora Core 4, while
libstdc++devel-3.4.3-22 and openmotif-21-2.1.30 were the updated versions
supplied for Fedora Core _3_ Whoever created the Oracle rpm is doing
something "interesting", but I'm not sure what.
>Some of these were easy to solve via a quick trip to rpmseek.com
Maybe not the best idea ever. For a newbie, you want to gain some more
experience with the highly dynamic and widely varying world of Linux
before you go stepping off the end of the pier. You do that by staying
with packages directly supplied by your distribution until you have
some idea what's going on under those blankets.
>[root@ow2 software]# rpm -Uvh libstdc++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm
>warning: libstdc++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY,
>key ID 443e1821
>error: Failed dependencies:
> libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1) is needed by (installed)
>kdelibs-3.5.4-0.1.fc5.i386
And that looks like an Fedora Core 5 box. Not compatible with Fedora
Core 3 or 4.
>I find that working with rpms is kind of confusing.
>I'm used to dealing with Solaris and FreeBSD which
>does not confuse me so much.
Do you routinely try to install pre-compiled Solaris 8 packages on Solaris
10 (and vice-versa)? How about OpenBSD or NetBSD binaries on your FreeBSD?
>What can I do to get
>libstdc++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm
>installed?
[compton ~]$ zgrep ' libstdc++-3' rpms.fc* fc* | awk '{ print $1" "$9 }'
rpms.fc2.gz:-rw-r--r-- libstdc++-3.3.3-7.i386.rpm
fc3-updates.06.15.05:-rw-r--r-- libstdc++-3.4.3-22.fc3.i386.rpm
[compton ~]$
libstdc++-3.4.5 was not part of Fedora. You'd better ask whoever you
got the Oracle package from what version of Red Hat/Fedora it was meant
to operate with. It doesn't look like it was for your FC5.
Old guy
-
Re: [Linux][c.o.l.s] Newb, rpm, Failed dependencies ...
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.setup, in article
<527m34-rjt.ln1@ridcully.ntlworld.com>, spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
>Peter Smith [gjfc] did eloquently scribble:
>
>> What can I do to get
>> libstdc++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm
>> installed?
>
>use rpm -i --nodeps
and hope that your backups are good
>That bypasses dependency checking
and may well torch your install, especially when using packages for
distributions two or three releases apart.
Andrew, you _might_ want to pay closer attention to those version numbers
Old guy
-
Re: [Linux][c.o.l.s] Newb, rpm, Failed dependencies ...
In comp.os.linux.setup Moe Trin :
> On 24 Nov 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.setup, in article
> <1164419250.666351.153120@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups. com>, Peter Smith [gjfc]
> wrote:
>>I'm trying to install Oracle on my RH box.
> What version of Oracle on what version of Red Hat?
[ complete mess of various rpm from various fc versions ]
> libstdc++-3.4.5 was not part of Fedora. You'd better ask whoever you
> got the Oracle package from what version of Red Hat/Fedora it was meant
> to operate with. It doesn't look like it was for your FC5.
Well spotted, to make a long story short I'd strongly suggest: to
the OP:
http://www.puschitz.com/
For some known to work detailed instructions to get oracle 9i/10g
running on RHEL, Fedora Core/etc.
--
Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
#bofh excuse 279: The static electricity routing is acting up...