-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike - EMAIL IGNORED escribió:

> Any opinions on which is better?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireshark

> Wireshark (formerly known as Ethereal) is a free software protocol
analyzer...


- --
Un saludo
Alo [alo(@)uk2.net]
PGP en http://pgp.eteo.mondragon.edu [Get "0xF6695A61 "]
Usuario registrado Linux #276144 [http://counter.li.org]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGVvtLvzPPcPZpWmERAmKMAJ41N89zMc4NnIHdegbdCq j90ocYrQCgnA+y
JAJWlXBxDVbiM5attt5zxao=
=Sxkt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On 25.05.2007, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> I have been using Ethereal on my Linux
> boxes. I was recently introduced to
> Wireshark for my MsWin boxes. I see
> that there is a version for Linux.
> The GUIs look rather similar.
> Any opinions on which is better?

Erm... You didn't read all the news on Wireshark's website, did you?

--
Secunia non olet.
Stanislaw Klekot

In newsan.2007.05.25.14.24.31.828994@yahoo.com,
Mike - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:

> I have been using Ethereal on my Linux
> boxes. I was recently introduced to
> Wireshark for my MsWin boxes. I see
> that there is a version for Linux.
> The GUIs look rather similar.
> Any opinions on which is better?

They are the same program.

On Fri, 25 May 2007 15:05:29 +0000, Stachu 'Dozzie' K. wrote:

> On 25.05.2007, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> I have been using Ethereal on my Linux
>> boxes. I was recently introduced to
>> Wireshark for my MsWin boxes. I see
>> that there is a version for Linux.
>> The GUIs look rather similar.
>> Any opinions on which is better?
>
> Erm... You didn't read all the news on Wireshark's website, did you?

Indeed, you are correct.
Thanks,
Mike.