gcc on Openserver 6

Has anyone successfully compiled gcc on Openserver 6?

gcc-4.1.1 compiles until:

cc -g -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o jvgenmain java/jvgenmain.o \
java/mangle_name.o errors.o intl.o ../libcpp/libcpp.a ./../intl/libintl.a \
.../libiberty/libiberty.a
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
vec_gc_o_reserve java/jvgenmain.o
ggc_free java/jvgenmain.o
vec_gc_p_reserve java/jvgenmain.o
vec_heap_p_reserve java/jvgenmain.o

-3-

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, third@whasup.com wrote:
> Has anyone successfully compiled gcc on Openserver 6?
>
> gcc-4.1.1 compiles until:

There is a port, but I am trying to put together enough people with funds
to pay the person who has done the port. He wants to be compensated for
all the work he has done in getting everything working. Please contact me
off usenet for the details and if you would like to assist in compensating
the deleloper for his efforts.

The port will not be available till the developer has been in his mind
properly compensated.

Thanks,

--
Boyd Gerber
ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047

Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, third@whasup.com wrote:
>
>>Has anyone successfully compiled gcc on Openserver 6?
>>
>>gcc-4.1.1 compiles until:
>
>
> There is a port, but I am trying to put together enough people with funds
> to pay the person who has done the port. He wants to be compensated for
> all the work he has done in getting everything working. Please contact me
> off usenet for the details and if you would like to assist in compensating
> the deleloper for his efforts.
>
> The port will not be available till the developer has been in his mind
> properly compensated.
>

How does this fit with the GPL?

Shouldn't the developer should either keep the port to himself or make
the source freely available?

Can one charge for a derivative of GPL'd code in this way?

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, RedGrittyBrick wrote:

> Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, third@whasup.com wrote:
>>
>> > Has anyone successfully compiled gcc on Openserver 6?
>> >
>> > gcc-4.1.1 compiles until:
>>
>>
>> There is a port, but I am trying to put together enough people with funds
>> to pay the person who has done the port. He wants to be compensated for
>> all the work he has done in getting everything working. Please contact me
>> off usenet for the details and if you would like to assist in compensating
>> the deleloper for his efforts.
>>
>> The port will not be available till the developer has been in his mind
>> properly compensated.
>>
>
> How does this fit with the GPL?
>
> Shouldn't the developer should either keep the port to himself or make the
> source freely available?
>
> Can one charge for a derivative of GPL'd code in this way?

One can charge for GPL binaries. The binaries must be distributed in
accordance with the GPL, which requires (amongst other things) that they
are accompanied with source code, or the offer of source code, so this is
perfectly acceptable.

Essentially, it allows the developer (in this case) to make a one-time
charge, because once he distributes the code to anyone, the recipient is
free to re-distribute to anyone else at zero charge.

Unless one distributes GPL code, there is no requirement to make the
changes available to anyone. This is how companies such as Google are able
to use modified versions of the Linux kernel, without contributing all of
their changes back to the kernel maintainers.

>
>

gcc on Openserver 6 - SCO

Thread: gcc on Openserver 6

LinkBack

Tools

gcc on Openserver 6

Re: gcc on Openserver 6

Re: gcc on Openserver 6

Re: gcc on Openserver 6