Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Yeah, samba and samba-ctl (or sambactl ?) seems better to me as well.


I wouldn't add the the net command to samba-ctl. I think it is a good approach
to have the same command on Linux and Windows and people are used to it.

And I'm sure it will break a lot of scripts and other tools which use the
'net' command. An option would be that net is a wrapper for samba-ctrl.

> Cheers,
> Jelmer

So long,

-- andreas