Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: New Proxy Unix CAP
* Jeremy Allison wrote, On 24/04/08 17:14:[color=blue]
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 04:59:33PM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
>> * Sam Liddicott wrote, On 21/04/08 09:44:
>>> * James Peach wrote, On 20/04/08 18:33:
>>>> If so, could you please add documentation to
>>>> <http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/UNIX_Extensions>, or a page that is
>>>> linked from there.
>> It seems that 0x003 was already taken:
>> SMB_REQUEST_TRANSPORT_ENCRYPTION 0x203 Call to set up an encryption
>> I think it was erroneously in File Info (and Path Info) levels and then
>> just moved.
>> Steve, I guess we need 0x204, or shall I change the docs to squash on
> No, SMB_REQUEST_TRANSPORT_ENCRYPTION is used in current 3.2 code
> as a SETFSINFO sub code. 0x204 is used 0x20C is the next unused
> SETFILEINFO sub code.
I think I want an FSINFO sub-code not a FILEINFO sub-code, so 0x204 is OK?
Or am I confused?