On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 03:15:41PM +0200, Martin Zielinski wrote:
> Hello list, gurus ...
>
> I'm totally aware that printing is not in the focus of development.
> That's ok, since few people seem to use it and the team members are very
> busy with things, I don't even have an idea how they work ;-)
>
> So hopefully noone feels affected, when I start a next try to push some
> printing patches upstream:
>
> 1st is a patch fixing two issues with Vista64 clients, which happen
> sporadically. If one had a 0x6f7 error with printer drivers - try it out.
>
> 2nd patch fixes an obvious bug in the detection of driver files in use.
> Currently files may be deleted, that are in use by other drivers.
>
> ================================================== ==================
> the next patches are all about the handling of comment and location strings
> of the printers:
>
> 3rd patch adds a function to update the ADS entry of a published
> printer, when the location or comment string has been altered.
>
> 4th patch adds the option to set the location string of a printer with
> rpcclient.
>
> 5th patch. For historical reasons Samba ignores the location string of
> the underlying printing system (if there is one).
> This patch changes this. If no location string is set, then the location
> will be set to that one from the spooler (made especially for cups).
>
> So than the "cups_pull_comment_and_location" call can be omitted.
> This call still results in total traffic bloat if no comment or location
> string is set. It should be removed.


I already fixed this in the 3.0.x and 3.2 trees.

> 6th patch adds a function to keep the strings in sync with cups when the
> user changes the strings from windows. This function might collide with
> an "addprinter command" - if one is set - because it will be executed
> after the function.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> all patches can be found at: ftp://ftp.seh.de/people/martin/
>
> It would be great, if someone has the time to look at the patches and
> give some feedback.
> Even better, if someone can make use of them.
> Of course, I can't give no warranties about the function of this patches
> - use at your own risk.


Actually printing is very important to us, and we're planning
to address these problems in the next release.

Can you post them on the list separately please, it makes it much
easier for us to include them that way.

Cheers,

Jeremy.