On 4/21/2008 3:51 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:21:59PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 4/21/2008, James A. Dinkel (jdinkel@bucoks.com) wrote:
>>> TCP_NODELAY is still usefull and has a noticeable improvement in
>>> responsiveness.


>> this is contrary to what the Samba devs have repeatedly said in the past.
>>
>> I hope someone will chime in here and set the record straight...


> That's easy -- TCP_NODELAY is default :-)


Well that explains it... thanks...

--

Best regards,

Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba