On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:24:03PM -0500, Derrell.Lipman@UnwiredUniverse.com wrote:
> Quick update... The problem appears to be that interpret_long_filename() is
> returning 0 as obtained from SVAL(base, 0) for each of the additional names,
> so interpret_long_filename() is being recalled with the same pointer over and
> over.


Ok - it looks like the length field isn't being set correctly.
Hmmmm. I'll look at a patch to get around that problem. Thanks
for tracking this down !

Jeremy