On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:30:06PM +0900, Neil Bortnak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I started using smbcacls and it worked great for everything except the
> set (-S) feature.
>
> After some time spent with the code and a packet sniffer I found that
> all of the other functions read in the existing dacl, modify it and
> write it back. The set function creates a new one.
>
> The revision number on the dacl that gets read from the server is 2,
> while the version number in set's created dacl is 3. I changed the
> created dacl to 2 and it works perfectly now.
>
> It may or may not be relevant, but I am using and testing this against a
> NetApp Filer, and not a standard NT/2000 system. I also popped in a few
> extra snippets of code.


Ok, I'll test this against a NT/2000 system as well. That's (unfortunately)
the standard by which all other implementations are judged.

Jeremy.