Re: [Samba] samba 3 performance issues
Beside the story Greg Folkert wrote (witch make sense)
remember this about GB network carts:
You'll never get a full 1000 mb/s !
i saw you have a celeron processor (witch ain't the fastest in performance)
coz' gb nic's tent to use a lot processor overhead, also raid cards use
(a little) processor time.
hdd through put is an issue, all together makes the performance.
I've tested 2 marvel yukons (pci-x) between 2 xp clients, with only
memory transfers and got (after some windows tweaking, coz windows isn't
gb lan ready by default!!!!) 500mb/s (so that is only 50%)
and had 99% proc. load. (pentium M 1.8)
on realtek gb lan cards it was even worse.
so a big processor(s) and real fast hdd's might do you some good!
so put this together with Greg's story, and you'll get the fact's.
Cheers, and good luck with testing/tweaking
Greg Folkert wrote:[color=blue]
> On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 13:52 -0500, Rohit Kumar Mehta wrote:[color=green]
>> I believe I have some hardware or configuration related performance
>> issues running samba 3.0.14a-3sarge.
>> Our server is an Intel Celeron 2 Ghz with 512 MB of RAM and a 3ware
>> card using SATA disks in a RAID 5 configuration (3ware controller card).
>> We have a gigabit network and are using Intel Gigabit ethernet cards
>> When copying large files to the samba shares on the system, the transfer
>> rate maxes out near 100 mb/s. We tested with nttcp and were able to get
>> speeds of nearly 800mb/s. So I think it is safe to conclude this is not
>> a network issue.
>> Various tools like top, xosview and mpstat convinced us that we are
>> bound in the CPU. Stopping the samba file transfer and the cpu idle time
>> exceeds 90%. We are convinced that our CPU is the bottleneck,
>> but not sure why.
>> #cat /proc/cpuinfo
>> processor : 0
>> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>> cpu family : 15
>> model : 2
>> model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz
>> stepping : 9
>> cpu MHz : 1996.920
>> cache size : 128 KB
>> fdiv_bug : no
>> hlt_bug : no
>> f00f_bug : no
>> coma_bug : no
>> fpu : yes
>> fpu_exception : yes
>> cpuid level : 2
>> wp : yes
>> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
>> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid
>> bogomips : 3956.73
>> Does anyone have any advice on how to speed up our file transfers? We
>> regularly have to 18 GB worth of files to this system, and it would be
>> very good if we could speed it up. At current speeds, we get no
>> advantage at all from even having gigabit network cards!
>> Please feel free to ask me any other questions about our system setup.
>> Thanks in advance for any advice,[/color]
> Have you done *ANY* system caching parameters, filesystem tuning, or
> Samba Config tuning?
> What have you done besides verify it is not the network itself?
> Have you tested throughput for the 3ware card?
> I can tell you this, if you have the RAID-5 setup not-optimally to work
> with the block sizing on your Filesystem you'll never get excellent
> I always tend to use largest blocking factors with the 3ware cards for
> RAID-5. This (for me at least) has proven the fastest and least latency
> ridden settings for me. But then I am using XFS on all of my 3ware
> RAID-5 setups.
> For Mirroring, I typically let the defaults work. Defaults have been by
> far the best setup for most filesystems. If you still believe you are
> suffering from CPU overload, I'd suggest sending it to the RAID-5 array
> with over compressed scp (with mild compression of 4 or 5) and then
> without compression. See what you get.
> I am betting the real problem comes from multiple bus-mastering cards
> conflicting or colliding. The Intel-E1000 and the 3ware card are
> definitely both bus-mastering.
> There are a couple of things on the Samba side you can do. Turn off
> Logging (you don't need it really), change the read and send buffer
> sizes, change the TCP setting it uses to be more in line with Gigabit,
> move to using Jumbo frames, get a TOE (TCP Offload Engine) NIC.
> Then if you still have issues, turn on logging for the stuff you are
> worried about (auth would be 0, etc...) and then add a sniffer to you
> connection. You'll definitely find something. My gut reaction is that
> since this is a Celeron Processor, you really need to goto 64-bit slots
> on the mother board. Getting a PCI-X capable motherboard would greatly
> help your problems.
> One last thing, any of the 95xx cards from 3ware are 3.3V only and are
> PCI2.3 compliant, they will function incorrectly possibly even be ruined
> or not recognized by a 5V or Auto-detect 5v/3.3v slot. The 9xxx, 8xxx
> and 7xxx cards can be used in either a 5V or 3.3V PCI slot.
> Good luck.
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the