-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matt Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Fermin Molina wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know exactly, but when I moved the information
>>> from NFS servers to local storage, the problems disappeared.

>>
>>
>> Samba assumes posix locking semantics on the filesystem.
>> NFS locking is broken. You might try setting
>> 'strict locking = no'. If that doesn't work, you might
>> try 'posix locking = no' just as a test.

>
> We'll give that a shot -- we're still doing fs->nfs->samba
> sharing. Is this going to incur a slowdown?


No. But if you are accessing the same file via NFS
and CIFS, you might have problems with applications
not recognizing each others locks.






jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEBcBrIR7qMdg1EfYRAkzqAKCGja38B0JCpPTkGkucAC yZebsiJQCgunBN
5UFAkiYNpLIRYq8RBcoKN8A=
=guFx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba