-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fermin Molina wrote:
>> Samba assumes posix locking semantics on the filesystem.
>> NFS locking is broken. You might try setting
>> 'strict locking = no'. If that doesn't work, you might
>> try 'posix locking = no' just as a test.

>
> Well, but I think the problem isn't located in the locking
> of NFS files; smbd daemons always get stalled doing a lock
> of "local" locking.tdb file. Then, must be broken the
> ext3 locking? In any case, maybe it's broken all locking
> system in linux kernel...


I understand the problem description. I stand by my
suggestion.

> Regarding another subject, I cannot try those settings
> because now that the information is 'local' to samba
> machine and not further mounted from the NFS server, there
> haven't been any problems...


OK.






cheers, jerry
================================================== ===================
I live in a Reply-to-All world -----------------------
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEBbPsIR7qMdg1EfYRAihKAJ4u8AN8XYBzU0Aow24dyT 1QRUOwlgCfZCmq
EkEhQGYkv0gmojOFs2UdjDM=
=yfnZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba