in our enterprise domain, there´s no reason to have more than ldap backends

greez

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Folks,
>
> We are discussing removing the capability to chaining passdb
> backends. It's a decent idea but overly complicates things
> IMO and unless it has wide spread use, we'll probably axe it
> soon (voting is starting up on the samba-tecnnical ml now).
>
> To give you an example of what I mean, is anyone using
> something like:
>
> passdb backend = smbpasswd ldapsam
>
> If you haven't been using this type of configuration, don't
> start now in case is does get removed in the next release.
>
>
>
>
> cheers, jerry
> ================================================== ===================
> I live in a Reply-to-All world. -----------------------
> Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
> Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFD68kFIR7qMdg1EfYRAqSIAKDnBGt/baHgFMW22QbC7iHggn0O6QCeN3y8
> EOpRWh9DNy6cxdHGjOUvtuo=
> =UVNa
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
Michael Gasch
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Department of Human Evolution (IT Staff)
Deutscher Platz 6
D-04103 Leipzig
Germany

Phone: 49 (0)341 - 3550 137
49 (0)341 - 3550 374

Fax: 49 (0)341 - 3550 399

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba