[Samba] question re multiple backends and the 'guest' backend - Samba
This is a discussion on [Samba] question re multiple backends and the 'guest' backend - Samba ; An inherited system has the following configuration:
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://10.10.10.10 smbpasswd guest
What is the purpose of using multiple backends? The smb.conf man page
simply states that each backend will be searched in turn but why would
one ever ...
-
[Samba] question re multiple backends and the 'guest' backend
An inherited system has the following configuration:
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://10.10.10.10 smbpasswd guest
What is the purpose of using multiple backends? The smb.conf man page
simply states that each backend will be searched in turn but why would
one ever use such a setup?
Secondly, the man page does not mention the 'guest' backend. To me
such a backend implies that an authentication challenge would never be
refused (guest is a catchall).
Comments?
Peter
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-
Re: [Samba] question re multiple backends and the 'guest' backend
I suspect that "guest" will simply allow someone to log on as a guest
with whatever privileges (usually none) you give to guests.
Peter Matulis wrote:
> An inherited system has the following configuration:
>
> passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://10.10.10.10 smbpasswd guest
>
> What is the purpose of using multiple backends? The smb.conf man page
> simply states that each backend will be searched in turn but why would
> one ever use such a setup?
>
> Secondly, the man page does not mention the 'guest' backend. To me
> such a backend implies that an authentication challenge would never be
> refused (guest is a catchall).
>
> Comments?
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-
Re: [Samba] question re multiple backends and the 'guest' backend
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale wrote:
> I suspect that "guest" will simply allow someone to log on as a guest
> with whatever privileges (usually none) you give to guests.
The "guest" backend is builtin and should not be specified
in smb.conf.
jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGK0hkIR7qMdg1EfYRAmDlAJ9YeumJbz3n8kv3WN65z2 NHUAFkfQCfUN08
KtjzcbSb+E+uiz9PAJOexIM=
=LAQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-
Re: [Samba] question re multiple backends and the 'guest' backend
Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 06:35:00AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gary Dale wrote:
> > I suspect that "guest" will simply allow someone to log on as a guest
> > with whatever privileges (usually none) you give to guests.
>
> The "guest" backend is builtin and should not be specified
> in smb.conf.
We also removed the support foir multiple passdb backends in latest
versions of samba IIRC, so passdb backend should never list more than 1
backend.
--
Simo Sorce idra@samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-
Re: [Samba] question re multiple backends and the 'guest' backend
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:25:11PM +0000, idra@samba.org wrote:
>
> We also removed the support foir multiple passdb backends in latest
> versions of samba IIRC, so passdb backend should never list more than 1
> backend.
Does this means it's not possible anymore to have most users coming
from an LDAP server, and to have additional "local" users (because
they can't be added to the LDAP server which is managed by other
people, for example) ?
If this is not possible anymore this sucks.
bye
Jerome Alet
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba