| Unix Content | Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
|
| Hi, I am trying to compiler my own kernel. Booting with the new kernel fails with the error message : "unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0). My hardware setup consits of a sata disk (/dev/sda1) and an ide disk (/dev/hda1). The root file system is installed on /dev/sda1. I used grub to install the boot record on the same system. The stock kernel that came with my linux distribution works fine from the same file system. There are no differences in the options used in grub's menu.1st for the two kernels (in booth cases root=/dev/sda1). I would be grateful if you could give me a pointer or two on how to go about identifying the cause of the boot failure. I suspect it may have to do with one of the kernel config options. But I am not sure which one. I can post the .config file if necessary. regards b thomas -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#2
|
| On 08 Dec 2007, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.questions, in article <475a7f5e$0$26075$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>, B Thomas wrote: COMMENT: "comp.os.linux.questions" is a bogus newsgroup only carried on mis-configured news servers trying to win the "we have more groups than anybody" contest. Try 'comp.os.linux.hardware'. >I am trying to compiler my own kernel. Booting with the new kernel fails >with the error message : "unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0). Your boot loader configuration is hosed. See the 'devices.txt' file that should be in your kernel source documentation. '0.0' is a null device. >My hardware setup consits of a sata disk (/dev/sda1) and an ide disk >(/dev/hda1). The root file system is installed on /dev/sda1. which would probably be dev 8:1, not 0.0. Did you include the "right" kernel driver as a compiled-in (not module) option? Did you compare your kernel configuration to that of the distribution kernel? >I used grub to install the boot record on the same system. The stock >kernel that came with my linux distribution works fine from the same >file system. There are no differences in the options used in grub's >menu.1st for the two kernels (in booth cases root=/dev/sda1). I'd be looking at the GRUB documentation none the less. I suspect you are missing some boot file or variable line. Oh, and it also helps to identify the existing distribution. Some are using some strange concepts. Old guy |