Re: PCI IRQ Routing table - forcing values - Portable
This is a discussion on Re: PCI IRQ Routing table - forcing values - Portable ; Hi Pete,
I agree, ACPI is certainly the way to go with newer laptops, but this one
is about 5 years old now, so most likely, it won't be ACPI compliant.
I do recall that when I had Windows installed ...
-
Re: PCI IRQ Routing table - forcing values
Hi Pete,
I agree, ACPI is certainly the way to go with newer laptops, but this one
is about 5 years old now, so most likely, it won't be ACPI compliant.
I do recall that when I had Windows installed on this computer at one
stage, there was mention of ACPI in the device manager, but I don't think
that this is necessarily referring to assignment of resources (although I
do find it a little strange).
Do you (or anyone else reading this) know of a way to check (other than
recompiling the Kernel) to see if this notebook has ACPI?
-
Re: PCI IRQ Routing table - forcing values
In <20030625215535.51af92f4.no@spam.com>, Mr-T wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> I agree, ACPI is certainly the way to go with newer laptops, but this
> one is about 5 years old now, so most likely, it won't be ACPI
> compliant.
>
> I do recall that when I had Windows installed on this computer at one
> stage, there was mention of ACPI in the device manager, but I don't
> think that this is necessarily referring to assignment of resources
> (although I do find it a little strange).
>
> Do you (or anyone else reading this) know of a way to check (other than
> recompiling the Kernel) to see if this notebook has ACPI?
The ACPI controller should appear as a PCI device, if it exists. You
should see a device listing from lspci for it. For instance on my desktop
(even though ACPI is not enabled) I see this:
00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
Also there may be some settings related to it in the BIOS, although a lack
thereof does not mean that it doesn't support ACPI. I'd also be skeptical
of a 5-year old machine supporting ACPI, although it actually has been
around for a while, if not supported decently under Linux -- I know that
some Pentium-era hardware I have used supported it.
--
Not to have been a dupe, that will have been my best possesion, my best
deed, to have been a dupe, wishing I wasn't, thinking I wasn't, knowing
I was, not being a dupe of not being a dupe.
--Samuel Beckett, The Unnamable
-
Re: PCI IRQ Routing table - forcing values
lobotomy wrote:
> In <20030625215535.51af92f4.no@spam.com>, Mr-T wrote:
>
>> Hi Pete,
>>
>> I agree, ACPI is certainly the way to go with newer laptops, but this
>> one is about 5 years old now, so most likely, it won't be ACPI
>> compliant.
>>
>> I do recall that when I had Windows installed on this computer at one
>> stage, there was mention of ACPI in the device manager, but I don't
>> think that this is necessarily referring to assignment of resources
>> (although I do find it a little strange).
>>
>> Do you (or anyone else reading this) know of a way to check (other than
>> recompiling the Kernel) to see if this notebook has ACPI?
>
> The ACPI controller should appear as a PCI device, if it exists. You
> should see a device listing from lspci for it. For instance on my desktop
> (even though ACPI is not enabled) I see this:
>
> 00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
I have several laptops which all use ACPI, and none of them have the ACPI
controller as a PCI device. They are mainly SIS chip boxes, but I know
ACPI works on them (in fact some of them have no APM) as the support is
loaded and used to shutdown the machine.
David
>
> Also there may be some settings related to it in the BIOS, although a lack
> thereof does not mean that it doesn't support ACPI. I'd also be skeptical
> of a 5-year old machine supporting ACPI, although it actually has been
> around for a while, if not supported decently under Linux -- I know that
> some Pentium-era hardware I have used supported it.
>
-
Re: PCI IRQ Routing table - forcing values
Thanks for the suggestion, but it hasn't solved the problem. The kernel
reported that there were invalid ACPI PCI IRQ routing tables and other
messages indicated that ACPI wasn't present.
I guess I'll have to keep trying or just buy a new notebook.
> > Also there may be some settings related to it in the BIOS, although a
> > lack thereof does not mean that it doesn't support ACPI. I'd also be
> > skeptical of a 5-year old machine supporting ACPI, although it
> > actually has been around for a while, if not supported decently under
> > Linux -- I know that some Pentium-era hardware I have used supported
> > it.
> >
>