erik quanstrom wrote:
>> How? If there's a stop message already written to /proc/n/ctl. Once
>> that is done, the process is guaranteed to be in 2 states and those
>> states only: continue waiting for the I/O, being actually Stopped.
>> Both of the don't let the scheduler take it to the runqueue.
>>

>
> here's the senerio, i think (works fine on a single processor)
> a b
> acquire debug lock
> sleep complete io
> sched
> run a bit
> syscall
> wakeup

But how "run a bit" could possibly happen if after the "stop" message
being sent right after the "complete io" the "b" process goes into
a "Stopped" state?

Thanks,
Roman.