Re: [9fans] mmap and shared libraries - Plan9

This is a discussion on Re: [9fans] mmap and shared libraries - Plan9 ; On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Eris Discordia wrote: > [root@host ~/clms]# ls -l `which vim` > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1221212 Oct 15 2006 /usr/local/bin/vim > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir gvim.exe > Volume in ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Re: [9fans] mmap and shared libraries

  1. Re: [9fans] mmap and shared libraries

    On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Eris Discordia wrote:
    > [root@host ~/clms]# ls -l `which vim`
    > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1221212 Oct 15 2006 /usr/local/bin/vim
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir gvim.exe
    > Volume in drive C has no label.
    > Volume Serial Number is B001-B4A3
    >
    > Directory of C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71
    >
    > 05/12/2007 12:19 PM 1,585,152 gvim.exe
    > 1 File(s) 1,585,152 bytes
    > 0 Dir(s) 5,075,197,952 bytes free
    >
    > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir vim.exe
    > Volume in drive C has no label.
    > Volume Serial Number is B001-B4A3
    >
    > Directory of C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71
    >
    > 05/12/2007 12:14 PM 1,372,160 vim.exe
    > 1 File(s) 1,372,160 bytes
    > 0 Dir(s) 5,075,197,952 bytes free
    >
    > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > So what? (and the two latter were _Windows_ binaries).
    >
    >> I realize that is utterly unfair. Sort of.

    >
    > Nice of you to realize that. Sort of.
    >


    yes, I agree, I was being terribly unfair to plan 9. Acme on plan 9 is
    about 1/2 M. Vim on DOS is 3x larger? impressive.

    Ron


  2. Re: [9fans] mmap and shared libraries

    On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ron minnich wrote:

    > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Eris Discordia
    > wrote:
    > > [root@host ~/clms]# ls -l `which vim`
    > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1221212 Oct 15 2006 /usr/local/bin/vim
    > >
    > >

    > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir gvim.exe
    > > Volume in drive C has no label.
    > > Volume Serial Number is B001-B4A3
    > >
    > > Directory of C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71
    > >
    > > 05/12/2007 12:19 PM 1,585,152 gvim.exe
    > > 1 File(s) 1,585,152 bytes
    > > 0 Dir(s) 5,075,197,952 bytes free
    > >
    > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir vim.exe
    > > Volume in drive C has no label.
    > > Volume Serial Number is B001-B4A3
    > >
    > > Directory of C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71
    > >
    > > 05/12/2007 12:14 PM 1,372,160 vim.exe
    > > 1 File(s) 1,372,160 bytes
    > > 0 Dir(s) 5,075,197,952 bytes free
    > >
    > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>
    > >
    > >

    > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > > So what? (and the two latter were _Windows_ binaries).
    > >
    > >> I realize that is utterly unfair. Sort of.

    > >
    > > Nice of you to realize that. Sort of.
    > >

    >
    > yes, I agree, I was being terribly unfair to plan 9. Acme on plan 9 is
    > about 1/2 M. Vim on DOS is 3x larger? impressive.
    >
    > Ron
    >
    > How much of that is library support code to make it work? :-)



  3. Re: [9fans] mmap and shared libraries

    don't forgot that plan 9 binaries are fully linked while most other
    systems pull in more code through dynamic linking when the binary is
    executed.

    -rob


+ Reply to Thread