Re: [9fans] bug in rio: unhiding deleted windows - Plan9

This is a discussion on Re: [9fans] bug in rio: unhiding deleted windows - Plan9 ; Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio. You may find it pretty easy to do ... ron...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Re: [9fans] bug in rio: unhiding deleted windows

  1. Re: [9fans] bug in rio: unhiding deleted windows

    Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio.
    You may find it pretty easy to do ...

    ron


  2. Re: [9fans] bug in rio: unhiding deleted windows

    2008/10/10 ron minnich

    > Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio.
    > You may find it pretty easy to do ...
    >
    > ron
    >


    Well, I will try to do so, just for fun And if I find how To this end
    (being a complete newbie to plan9, actually a physicist), is that ^t^tr
    handled by rio?

    Ruda


  3. Re: [9fans] bug in rio: unhiding deleted windows

    On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:33 AM, ron minnich wrote:
    > Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio.
    > You may find it pretty easy to do ...


    if rio is broken it may not be able to figure out the key sequence. it
    should go in devcons, where the rest of the ^T^T stuff is. i still
    think that a hard look at ^T^TD with a lot of poking around
    (preferably with a large hammer) may provide a method for killing a
    particular process but i don't have a terminal handy to verify.


  4. Re: [9fans] bug in rio: unhiding deleted windows

    i'm sure jmk will kill me for this. is the proc arena contiguous? if
    not this could be a double-FAIL

    % diff /tmp/devcons.c devcons.c
    481,490d480
    < case '☺':
    < {
    < Proc *p; int i;
    < for(i = 0; i < conf.nproc; i++) {
    < p = proctab(i);
    < if(p->state == Broken)
    < unbreak(p);
    < }
    < }
    < return;

+ Reply to Thread