Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio.
You may find it pretty easy to do ...
ron
Printable View
Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio.
You may find it pretty easy to do ...
ron
2008/10/10 ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
[color=blue]
> Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio.
> You may find it pretty easy to do ...
>
> ron
>[/color]
Well, I will try to do so, just for fun :) And if I find how :) To this end
(being a complete newbie to plan9, actually a physicist), is that ^t^tr
handled by rio?
Ruda
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:33 AM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio.
> You may find it pretty easy to do ...[/color]
if rio is broken it may not be able to figure out the key sequence. it
should go in devcons, where the rest of the ^T^T stuff is. i still
think that a hard look at ^T^TD with a lot of poking around
(preferably with a large hammer) may provide a method for killing a
particular process but i don't have a terminal handy to verify.
i'm sure jmk will kill me for this. is the proc arena contiguous? if
not this could be a double-FAIL :)
% diff /tmp/devcons.c devcons.c
481,490d480
< case '☺':
< {
< Proc *p; int i;
< for(i = 0; i < conf.nproc; i++) {
< p = proctab(i);
< if(p->state == Broken)
< unbreak(p);
< }
< }
< return;