On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:21 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> Obviously Plan 9's compiler
>> isn't optimal.. but what really are the requirements people

> really? that depends on your definition of optimal.
> by my definition which heavily rates speed of compliation
> and correctness, it's sure closer than the competition.

for people whose programs run in time units measured in 1/4 years,
compilation speed as an issue is in the noise.