[9fans] Thoughts about Plan 9 development, UAT, and production.

Would it be beneficial to have public accessible revision control
servers for Plan 9 development and UAT?

I`m interested in the developers` thoughts about access, revision
control, and moving forward as a community. Are people having a
problem with the present model? If so, then what are your suggestions
for improvements?

Uriel, this isn`t intended as an opportunity for you or anyone else to
rant. I want to know what everyone else thinks for a change. :)

If all is well, I`d like to know that too.

Regards,
Vester

> I`m interested in the developers` thoughts about access, revision[color=blue]
> control, and moving forward as a community. Are people having a
> problem with the present model? If so, then what are your suggestions
> for improvements?[/color]

In the debate between the "cathedral" and the "bazaar" models, where
do you think Plan 9 belongs? Would you really have it otherwise?

++L

i find it fine the way it is, but i haven't been submitting any
patches recently.

On 5/11/07, Vester Thacker <vester.thacker@gmail.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> Would it be beneficial to have public accessible revision control
> servers for Plan 9 development and UAT?
>
> I`m interested in the developers` thoughts about access, revision
> control, and moving forward as a community. Are people having a
> problem with the present model? If so, then what are your suggestions
> for improvements?
>
> Uriel, this isn`t intended as an opportunity for you or anyone else to
> rant. I want to know what everyone else thinks for a change. :)
>
> If all is well, I`d like to know that too.
>
> Regards,
> Vester
>[/color]


--
Christopher Nielsen
"They who can give up essential liberty for temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin