On 4/26/07, Russ Coxwrote:
> look for push1 and revertdcl.
Thanks.
--Joel
This is a discussion on Re: [9fans] scopes in kencc - Plan9 ; > In my compilers class, the professor suggested using some linked list > of scopes so that lookup would always return the nearest symbol by a > given name (modulo namespace issues). Since there's a single global > symbol table ...
> In my compilers class, the professor suggested using some linked list
> of scopes so that lookup would always return the nearest symbol by a
> given name (modulo namespace issues). Since there's a single global
> symbol table in kencc, what tells lookup to return the properly scoped
> symbol?
only the properly scoped symbol is in the hash table
during the lookup. new declarations replace old ones
but the old ones get added to an undo log. when a } is
reached, the undo log is applied to put the old ones back.
this is a very common "implicit" representation of the scope.
appel's book, at least, discusses it as an alternative
to the linked-list-of-scopes approach.
look for push1 and revertdcl.
russ
On 4/26/07, Russ Coxwrote:
> look for push1 and revertdcl.
Thanks.
--Joel